Portuguese Version

Year:  2008  Vol. 74   Ed. 1 - (22º)

Relato de Caso

Pages: 137 to 142

PDF PT   PDF EN

Foreign body in the Eustachian tube - case presentation and technique used for removal

Author(s): Fernando de Andrade Quintanilha Ribeiro 1

Keywords: foreign body, middle ear, eustachian tube.

Abstract:
Foreign bodies of the external ear are very common; the same can not be said about foreign bodies of the middle ear, especially of the Eustachian tube. Case presentation: Alcoholic and psychopathic patient presented a foreign body (barbecue wooden stick) purposefully introduced in his middle ear and Eustachian tube during an act of delinquency. The foreign body was stuck in the tube and could not be removed externally. It was surgically removed as described by the authors later on in the paper. Comments: The patient recovered well, with no sequela on the facial nerve and without important vertigo.

INTRODUCTION

Foreign bodies in the ear are frequent, and they are almost always located in the external auditory meatus1,2. The most common in children are seeds and parts of plastic toys. Button batteries have also been reported and may cause more problems if not removed early on3. Middle ear foreign bodies are rarer and usually happen after accidents, and because of their consequences, they are diagnosed quickly4. We may consider as foreign bodies those objects used in surgeries such as ossicle prostheses, plastic tapes used to avoid tympanic adherenses or ventilation tubes5. This hereby described case of a foreign body in the Eustachian tube is extremely rare.


LITERATURE REVIEW

We did not find any report of a foreign body in the Eustachian Tube reported in the literature.


CASE PRESENTATION

A 50 year old male, street dweller, chronic alcoholic, demented, was admitted to the hospital with multiple cranio-facial injuries, among them he had an ethmoidal fracture, small laminar subdural hematoma, internal carotid thrombosis on the right side and a foreign body that could be seen in the right external acoustic meatus (Figure 1, Figure 2). After being discharged from observation in the neurology ward he was refferred to the ENT department, where the CT scan showed a foreign body that had penetrated through the external acoustic meatus, invaded the middle ear and went down the Eustachian tube. There was an injury in the carotid canal and thrombosis in the internal carotid artery (Figures 3-7a), in its furcation, proven by arteriogram (Figures 8-9a). The patient refused a complete audiologic workup, and we noticed only a profound hearing loss on the right side. Internal medicine doctors examined him and aproved him for general anesthesia for foreign body removal. He was conscious and able to converse, however because of his dementia he did not make sense when he spoke.

Figure 1. Multiple injuries patient.


Figure 2. Foreign body in the right side external acoustic meatus.


Figure 3. Foreign body in the external acoustic meatus and middle ear, dislocating the ossicular chain towards the mastoid region.


Figure 4. Foreign body filling up the middle ear.


Figure 5. Foreign body in the right Eustachian Tube, compared to the left tube.


Figure 6. View of the left tube, with the CT scan for comparison.


Figure 6a. Blue - cochlea in red - carotid canal in green - central nervous system in yellow - part of the tube filled by the foreign body.


Figure 7. View of the right side Eustachian tube, filled by the foreign body.


Figure 7a. Foreign body schematics to enhance view.


Figure 8. Side view arteriogram, noticing the thrombosis blocking the entire right side carotid artery.


Figure 9. Coronal view with thrombosis blocking the entire right carotid artery.


Figure 9a. Left carotid coronal view to compare and the circulation at the Willis polygon.

SURGERY DESCRIPTION

Under general anesthesia we noticed a foreign body that appeared to be a wood stick used to make barbecue. With a strong forceps we mobilized it in an attempt to remove it, and because of the carotid thrombosis it would be very unlikely to have profuse bleeding. The foreign body did not move. We did a retro-auricular approach with incision in the meatus skin. Since it filled the whole space, we did a mastoidectomy, through which we noticed incus dislocation towards the mastoid cavity. It was removed, together with the malleus. We did a canal wall down approach and in the mastoid cavity we noticed that the wood stick filled the entire middle ear and seemed to progress towards the Eustachian tube. We tried to remove it again, unsuccesfully. We decided to cut it with the burr and keep on using the burr all the way to the begining of the Eustachian Tube. We did not see the stapes. At this point we noticed that the stick penetrated the tube like a locking wedge used in ship building. With the burr we proceeded in cutting all the bone around but especially the wood stick itself which was cut from inside and then pushed inside the lumen made by the burr. There were no reference points, but we saw the carotid canal erosion. We progressed like this for about six centimeters, always drilling down on the stick itself and removing a little of the adjacent bone. Our attempts to remove it were unsuccesful. After this course we noticed the bone had ended and there was soft tissue ahead (cartilaginous portion of the tube). At this point the tip of the wood stick felt loosen and could be removed. Medially we observed a small central nervous system dehiscence. Under the surgical microscope we observed a larger space that would open inferiorly and that was later confirmed as being the nasopharynx after we used the nasal endoscope to look at it. The broad cavity left behind in the tube was filled with muscle and the surgical wound was similar to that left after a canal wall down mastoidectomy (Figures 10-14). We rebuilt the meatus and sutured the retroauricular incision.

Figure 10. Postoperative cavity, similar to a canal wall down procedure.


Figure 11. Postoperative cavity, notice lesion in the inferior semicircular canal.


Figure 12. Postoperative cavity with intact cochlea.


Figure 13. Eustachian tube region before the procedure, still with the foreign body.


Figure 14. Enlarged tube after the procedure for foreign body removal.

In a later CT scan we noticed na erosion of the inferior semicircular canal and of the carotid canal, and part of the central nervous system exposure.


DISCUSSION

We did not find any similar case of foreign body in the Eustachian tube in the literature so as to compare characteristics and discuss removal approaches.

The patient's past history was uknown to us, and his interview did not add much. What we did know was that he had suffered multiple injuries from a criminal act. It was not possible to define the date of his injuries, but analyzing the internal carotid thrombosis, without brain lesion detected at the CT Scan and without aparent sequelae, it was reasonable to infer that it had not been very recent. The foreing body, a wood stick used in barbecues was probably hammered down his ear, breaking through the ear drum, hitting the promontory and finding its way throught the Eustachian Tube. It fit there under pressure like a locking wedge, without much possibility for removal. The technique we used, drilling down the foreign body, which we have used before to remove bullets, proved to be the most adequate at the time. There was not much bleeding and the patient recovered well, without facial paralysis or vertigo. He had no auditory complaints, but his audiologic evaluation was impaired by his dementia, we observed a profound hearing loss on the right side, already present in the preoperative period. He did not complain of tinnitus, but he said he could hear voices. He was later referred to the psychiatric ward and the social services.


FINAL COMMENTS

This case shows us the extent of human violence, but also the extent of our body's endurance.


REFERENCES

1. Schulze SL, Kerschner J, Beste D.Pediatric external auditory canal foreign bodies: a review of 698 cases. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;127(1):73-8.

2. Thompson SK, Wein RO, Dutcher PO. External auditory canal foreign body removal: management practices and outcomes. Laryngoscope 2003;113(11):1912-5.

3. Lin VY, Daniel SJ, Papsin BC. Button batteries in the ear, nose and upper aerodigestive tract. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2004; 68(4):473-9.

4. Bruno E, Alessandrini M, Russo S, D'Erme G, Nucci R. Perilymphatic fistula following trans-tympanic trauma: a clinical case presentation and review of the literature. An Otorrinolaringol Ibero Am 2002;29(4):359-66.

5. Kupperman D, Tange RA. Ionomeric cement in the human middle ear cavity: long-term results of 23 cases. Laryngoscope 2001;111(2):306-9.











1 Adjunct Professor - Department of Otorhinolaryngology - School of Medical Sciences - Santa Casa de São Paulo.
Paper submitted to the ABORL-CCF SGP (Management Publications System) on March 10th, 2005 and accepted for publication on March 22th, 2005. cod. 88.

Print: