Portuguese Version

Year:  2013  Vol. 79   Ed. 3 - ()

Carta ao Editor

Pages: 275 to 275

Endoscopic surgery to treat inverted papilloma: which are the limits?

Author(s): Erika Ferreira Gomes

DOI: 10.5935/1808-8694.20130050

Keywords: inverted; natural orifice endoscopic surgery; papilloma.

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic surgery has made substantial contributions to advance on the limits of nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses and skull base surgeries, with growing applications, especially in the treatment of tumors and reconstructive approaches. The paper published about a "Retrospective Analysis of 26 cases of nasal inverted papilloma", showing the feasibility of the endoscopic approach to treat the inverted papilloma is very important.


CASE PRESENTATION

In a review published about 26 patients (19.2%) there was tumor left over, there is no information whether the approach initially used in these cases was endoscopic, open or combined1.


DISCUSSION

The recent publication shows that the inverted papilloma, when operated by endonasal endoscopy only, has a greater recurrence rate. In a series of 26 recurred tumors, 21 had been resected by the endoscopic approach2 . The purely endonasal endoscopic approach provides for a broad access to the nasal cavity, medial wall and posterior wall of the maxillary sinus, frontal and sphenoid sinuses3 . For tumors involving the anterior wall, the lateral or inferior wall of the maxillary sinus, it is useful to add a small sublabial incision for a combined transmaxillary access using the endoscope, which helps reduce the likelihood of residual tumor being left behind in these cases.


FINAL REMARKS

External approaches, such as the Weber-Ferguson and the mid-facial degloving, have been replaced by the endoscope4. Despite all the technical advantages of the fully endonasal endoscopic approach, one must consider the combined transmaxillary technique - when operating T3 or T4 tumors - because of the high rate of recurrence inherent to the biological behavior of the tumor and the morbidity associated with reoperations in the affected age range5.


REFERENCES

1. Sousa AMA, Vicenti AB, Speck Filho J, Cahali MB. Retrospective analysis of 26 cases of inverted nasal papillomas. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;78(1):26-30. PMid:22392234

2. Lian F, Juan H. Different endoscopic strategies in the management of recurrent sinonasal inverted papilloma. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23(1):e44-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e318241dae7PMid:22337461

3. Martins MJB, Feijão M, Aguiar C, Abreu JP, Gomes E, Rolim G, et al. Papiloma Invertido: Revisão de Literatura e Relato de 13 casos. 40º Congresso Brasileiro de Otorrinolaringologia. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;76 Suppl(5). [Acessado em 26 de março de 2012]. Disponível em: http://www.rborl.org.br/40CBO/index.html

4. Ferreira LMBM, Rios ASN, Gomes EF, Azevedo JF, Araújo RP, Moraes RB. Midfacial degloving - acess to nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses lesions. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;72(2):158-62. PMid:16951847

5. Salomone R, Matsuyama C, Giannotti Filho O, Alvarenga ML, Martinez Neto EE, Chaves AG. Bilateral inverted papilloma: case report and literature review. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;74(2):293-6. PMid:18568211









Specialist in General Surgery and Otorhinolaryngology (Graduate Student - Medical School of the University of São Paulo); Assistant Physician - General Hospital of Fortaleza SUS/SESA). General Hospital of Fortaleza - SUS/SESA.

Send correspondence to
Erika Ferreira Gomes
Rua Carolina Sucupira, nº 1151. Aldeota
Fortaleza - CE. Brazil. CEP: 60140-120

Paper submitted to the BJORL-SGP (Publishing Management System - Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology) on March 12, 2012.
Accepted on August 23, 2012.

Print:

BJORL

 

 

Voltar Back      Topo Top

 

GN1
All rights reserved - 1933 / 2024 © - Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico Facial