Portuguese Version

Year:  2007  Vol. 73   Ed. 6 - (6º)

Artigo Original

Pages: 752 to 758

PDF PT   PDF EN

Group follow up proposal for elderly with hearing aids

Author(s): Eliara Pinto Vieira1, Elisiane Crestani de Miranda2, Lucila Leal Calais3, Laura Maria Araújo de Carvalho4, Maria Cecília Martinelli Iório5, Alda Christina Lopes de Carvalho Borges6

Keywords: hearing, hearing aids, elderly, hearing disorder

Abstract:
Implementing rehabilitation programs to hearing impaired adults is of great importance, mainly in the elderly population, and it is necessary to add them to the routine of outpatient care programs. Aim: to present a group care program for elderly patients who are fitted with hearing aids. Material and Method: to carry out a pilot study of clinical and experimental type, with the participation of 40 elderly users of hearing aids donated by the government, distributed within six groups, with maximum of eight participants jointly with their respective companions. Program consisted of three meetings every fifteen days, where information and education on the proper use hearing aids was transmitted. Results: Most of the patients participated actively in the meetings spontaneously giving their opinion or answering questions when so requested. All elderly had been informed as to the importance of accepting their auditory deficiency and on the need to be motivated towards using hearing aids. Moreover, listening to depositions of other elderly users seemed to facilitate understanding of their own difficulties and stimulated them in the process of getting used to the sound amplification. Conclusion: Groups structure facilitated interaction among aged ones, helping them to clarify communication doubts and strategies and, consequently, it promoted their adaptation.

INTRODUCTION

In the last century we have seen an increase in population longevity and demographic aging is a world trend.

According to data from the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE)1 in the year 2000 Brazil had 171,279,882 inhabitants, with 13,915,357 (8.1%) elderly people. The estimated general population for 2020 is 219,077,729, with 28,321,801 (12.9%) elderly people. The estimated number of elderly people for 2050 is equivalent to 24.7% of the total population.

With the development of medical technology, life expectancy increased and as a consequence there are much more senile illnesses and problems associated with this group of people2.

Aging is defined as a progressive and degenerative process characterized by less functional efficiency with the weakening of defense mechanisms. It is a universal and intrinsic process, that is to say, it is not determined by environmental factors despite their influence and it is different from diseases that many times are reversible and not seen in all old people in the same way3.

Among the several problems which affect the quality of life of the elderly, hearing problems are among the most common complications as it has been showed in several epidemiological studies. 4-8

The term presbycusis refers to hearing loss as a consequence of the aging process9. This hearing loss is characterized by the result of different types of physiological degenerations associated with the effects of noise exposure, health problems and its treatment and genetic susceptibility10.

According to the literature11-15, hearing loss in the elderly is usually related to the deterioration of other sensory systems. Together with the hearing loss we can have the combined effect of multiple deficiencies, such as reduced cognitive performance, dementia, lack of manual skills and visual acuity.

Some authors16,14,17 report that hearing function deterioration on the aging process affects both communication and social and emotional domains, since it means a significant reduction in interaction and personal contacts.

Thus, social relationship of elderly people is affected by the disabilities of the aging process because they feel less valued and with less self-esteem. This gets worse with their difficulty to communicate. 18

The old person who complains of hearing sensitivity must be sent for a complete audiological evaluation. However, it is necessary to state that audiometric measurements are not enough to describe the patient's reaction to hearing loss and the determination of communicative skills in their daily life and psycho-social function19. Thus, self-evaluation questionnaires are useful tools to quantify the emotional and social/situational consequences perceived due to hearing loss 20,7.

When presbycusis and its consequences for the life of the elderly are verified, we notice the importance of hearing rehabilitation work in order to minimize the effects of hearing deficiency in the geriatric population21.

Getting used to a hearing device is hard at any age, especially for elder people. This is because elder people usually require more time to comprehend all the stages on the selection and adaptation process of amplification, and as a consequence, information should be presented gradually.

Education must be stressed so the user understands the way the hearing device works together with its components and the auricular mold. They must be trained in how to place it inside the ear and how to remove it, how to change batteries and to handle the control system22.

Thus, it is extremely important to implementat rehabilitation programs for hearing disabled adults and it is necessary to include these programs into the daily tasks of speech therapy outpatient clinics. These programs corroborate the elderly national policy which aims to guarantee the elderly social rights, preparing conditions for promoting their independence, interaction and effective participation in society23.

In order to illustrate this situation, here are some data from a Public Service on the diagnosis of hearing deficiency, selection and adaptation of hearing devices by the SIA-SUS (Public Health System) (APACS).

In this Service, 266 patients received a hearing device during March and July 2005. 120 (45 %) of them were elderly people, 46 (38.3%) were men and 74 (61.7%) were women. Out of the total number of old people 18 (15%) received a monoaural fitting and 102 (85%) received binaural fitting, with 222 hearing devices donated.

According to what it has been said above, this piece of work aims to show a group service program for elderly people with hearing devices.


METHOD

A research and outreach project was prepared with the proposal of this Service and the Research Ethics

Committee of a Further Education Institution approved it with protocol number 1107/05.

Following ethical and legal principles, elderly people signed a Free and Informed Consent to take part in the project which had information on this service, such as its goal, justification, benefits for the participants and additional information.

A pilot study was done to evaluate the feasibility of this program. The sample included 40 elderly people with 15 men and 25 women aged between 60 and 90 years old (average age 76.3 years old) and who had received a device on this Service through the Public Health Care System (SUS).

Inclusion criteria were as follows:

 Minimum age 60 years old (a criteria established by World Health Organization for developing countries);

 Time availability to attend the meetings after the donation of hearing devices;

 To live near the Service (Southern area of the city of São Paulo-SP);

 Without any moving disabilities.

The elderly people using hearing devices were divided into six groups with a maximum number of eight with their own relatives and/or assistants. The distribution of the elderly people into small groups aimed to offer them a better attention and to facilitate interaction among participants.

The program included three fortnightly meetings coordinated by speech therapists at the Service who use audio-visual resources and group techniques to share necessary information and orientations with the elderly. Each meeting had different goals.

The first meeting was held one week after the hearing devices were donated and had the following goals:

a) Introducing the participants of the group;

b) Explaining how group service works, clarifying the importance of their presence at all meetings and the need of having a relative or a close person attending the meetings together with the elderly person.

c) Explaining the following questions: What is hearing loss? Which are the degrees of hearing loss? What are hearing devices for? What is the reason for binaural or monoaural fitting? In order to make explanations easier, professionals used slides with the average acoustic values of frequency and intensity of Brazilian Portuguese speech sounds, displayed in the graphic registry of the audiogram24. Thus, it was possible to show each person what his/her hearing loss configuration was like, proving which sounds were audible without the hearing device and which he/she started to hear after using the device.

d) Strengthening guidance on how the hearing device works and how to clean it and maintain it.

e) Two questionnaires were used, one to be answered by the elderly person and the other one for a relative and/or assistant, aiming to compare the perceptions of both on the difficulties and the benefits regarding the use of the hearing device (Appendix A and Appendix B).

Questionnaires were specifically prepared for this study and they were given to the group by the responsible speech therapists, however each old person had the opportunity to voice his/her opinion. During the questionnaire old people did not have access to alternative answers.

Questionnaires had questions with multiple choice questions and others had open questions. For those multiple questions, the speech therapist selected, among the alternative answers, the ones corresponding to those mentioned by the elderly people. On the other hand, for the open questions, the speech therapist transcribed the answer given by the elderly person.

At the end of this first meeting, participants received an information brochure specially prepared for this program with clearly written orientations (Appendix C).

The second meeting was held 21 days after the hearing devices were given and it had the following goals:

a) Promoting the exchange of opinions on the impact of hearing disability and hearing devices fitting at an old age with their statements on how they experienced the use of devices, their main difficulties and benefits until this moment, among other issues.

b) Offering facilitating communication strategies for elderly people, besides giving them an information brochure at the end of the meeting with communication guidelines for people with hearing disabilities25 (Appendix D).

The third meeting took place 35 days after the hearing devices were given and it had the following goals:

a) Promoting the reading and further discussion of a text on social isolation experienced by old people with communication problems as a consequence of a hearing disability;

b) Clarifying the possible doubts they may still have on adaptation to the hearing device;

c) A new questionnaire also done specially for this program aiming to evaluate the understanding of the guidelines offered during the group meetings. (Appendix E).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Most elderly people actively participated in the meetings, expressing their opinions in a spontaneous way or answering the questions when they were asked. All of them were guided on the importance of accepting hearing loss and on the need of being motivated to use the hearing devices22. Besides, listening to other people stories seemed to facilitate the understanding of their own difficulties and it encouraged them during the adaptation process to amplification.

Similarly to literature26, we observed that the support group is important for developing skills and for building up trust to interact with other people, making the whole inter-personal communicative process much easier.

Furthermore, speech therapists can introduce strategies to facilitate communication, to strengthen guidance on how to take care, handle and clean hearing devices and/or auricular molds, and also they can provide patients with information on hearing.

Regarding communication strategies, some authors21,27 state that the use of these devices facilitates speech understanding and having a dialogue which keeps the communication process active.

In regard to questionnaires, they have been used to evaluate the benefit, use and satisfaction of people with hearing devices, as well as in following up the adaptation process20,7. Thus, it was possible to evaluate the patient's communicative performance after receiving the device and to get to know his/her opinion on the main difficulties and benefits experienced in daily situations, as it has been showed in the literature. 28. It was also possible to considerate the usefulness of the program.

In the last meeting we discussed social isolation due to communication difficulties. One of the participants, a 78 year old lady said that ".. I used to watch TV very loud and no one in my family would stay in the room... I stopped attending an elderly group because I didn't hear what the coordinator said. I couldn't understand or talk to the doctors on my visits...". This lady's report clearly shows the social difficulties these elderly people experience, a fact already commented by several authors18,16,14,17.


CONCLUSION

Group work was useful for the interaction among the elderly people and it made possible to clarify doubts and communication strategies, favoring the adaptation process.

It is believed that more studies on the effectiveness of this type of service proposal are needed, since there are an increasing number of registered services for the donation of hearing devices by the Public Health System (SUS) and therefore, geriatric population increasingly demands this service.


REFERENCES

1. Ibge.gov.br [sítio na internet]. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística; 2000 [revisado 2004; citado 2006 Jan 10]. Disponível em http://www.ibge.gov.br.

2. Ferre RJ, Morello-Castro G. Validation of the otoacoustic emissions in presbyacusis. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2003;54:177-82.

3. Ribeiro A. Manual para viver bem uma longa vida. São Paulo: Egrasa S.A; 1991. 107p.

4. Morrell CH, Gordon-Salant S, Pearson JD, Brant LJ, Fozart JL. Age and gender-specific reference ranges for hearing level and longitudinal changes in hearing level. J Acous Soc Am 1996;100:1949-57.

5. Kacker SK. Hearing impairment in the aged. Indian J Med Res 1997;106:333-9.

6. Cruickshanks K, Wiley TL, Tweed TS, Klein BE, Klein R, Mares-Perlman JA, Nondahl DM. Prevalence of hearing loss in older adults in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin: The epidemiology of hearing loss study. Am J Epidemiol 1998;148:879-86.

7. Hands S. Hearing loss in over-65s: is routine questionnaire screening worthwhile? J Laryngol Otol 2000;114:661-6.

8. Espmark AKK, Rosenhall U, Erlandsson S, Steen B. The two faces of presbyacusis: hearing impairment and psychosocial consequences. Int J Audiol 2002;42:125-35.

9. Chisolm TH, Willott JF, Lister JJ. The aging auditory system: anatomic and physiologic changes and implications for rehabilitation. Int J Audiol 2003;42:3-10.

10. CHABA - Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics and Biomechanics. Speech understanding an aging. J Acoust Soc Am 1988;83:859-95.

11. Rosenhall U. Presbyacusis-hearing loss in old age. Lakartidningen 2001;98:2802-6.

12. Veiga LR, Garcez VRC. Perfil global do idoso candidato ao uso de prótese auditiva (método HASP). Pró-fono 2002;14:425-36.

13. Rosemberg J. Divagações sobre a velhice. Folha méd 2002;121:139-47.

14. Erber NP. Use of hearing aids by older people: influence of non-auditory factors (vision, manual dexterity). Int J Audiol 2003;42:21-5.

15. Kiessling J, Pichora-Fuller MK, Gatehouse S, Stephens D, Arlinger S, Chisolm T, Davis AC, Erber NP, Hickson L, Holmes A, Rosenhall U, Von Wedel H. Candidature for and delivery of audiological services: special needs of older people. Int J Audiol 2003;42:92-101.

16. Mazelová J, Popelar J, Syka J. Auditory function in presbycusis: peripheral vs. central changes. Exp Gerontol 2003;38:87-94.

17. Pinheiro MMC, Pereira LD. Processamento auditivo em idosos: estudo da interação por meio de testes com estímulos verbais e não-verbais. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol 2004;70:209-14.

18. Quintero SM, Marotta RMB, Marone SAM. Avaliação do processamento auditivo de indivíduos idosos com e sem presbiacusia por meio do teste de reconhecimento de dissílabos em tarefa dicótica - ssw. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol 2002;68:28-33.

19. Caporali AS, Silva JA. Reconhecimento de fala no ruído em jovens e idosos com perda auditiva. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol 2004;70:525-32.

20. Corrêa GF, Russo ICP. Autopercepção do handicap em deficientes auditivos adultos e idosos. Rev CEFAC 1999;1:54-63.

21. Iervolino SMS, Castiglioni M, Almeida K. A orientação e o aconselhamento no processo de reabilitação auditiva. In: Almeida K & Iório MCM. Próteses auditivas: fundamentos teóricos e aplicações clínicas. São Paulo: Lovise; 2003. cap.17, p.411-27.

22. Oliveira JRM, Motti TFG, Neuber DRD, Prado EP, Creppe SVTZ, Andrade CF. Dificuldades encontradas pelos deficientes auditivos adultos, após a adaptação do aparelho de amplificação sonora individual (AASI). Acta AWHO. 2001;20:201-5.

23. Tanaka MRT, Araújo VM, Assencio-Ferreira VJ. Déficits de audição em idosos dificultariam a comunicação? Rev CEFAC 2002;4:203-5.

24. Russo ICP, Behlau M. Percepção da fala: análise acústica do Português brasileiro. São Paulo: Lovise; 1993. 57p.

25. Boone M, Clark JG, Trychin S. Communication guidelines for people with hearing loss. Effective Counseling in Audiology: Perspectives and Practice. NJ: Prentice Hall; 1994. p.275-6.

26. Tye-Murray N. Repair strategy usage by hearing impaired adults and chances following communication therapy. J Speech Hear Res 1991;34:921-8.

27. Mello JM, Oliveira JRM, Aringa AHBD, Oliveira VV, Zacare CC. Estratégias de comunicação utilizadas por portadores de deficiência auditiva neurossensorial moderada. Pró-fono 2004;16:111-8.

28. Almeida K, Taguchi CK. Utilização do questionário na auto-avaliação do benefício das próteses auditivas. Pró-Fono 2004;16:101-10.







1 Doctorate Student in Human Communication Disorders at UNIFESP/EPM, Speech Therapist at the Integrated Center for Attention, Research and Learning in Hearing at UNIFESP/EPM.
2 M.Sc, in Human Communication Disorders at Universidade Federal de São Paulo (São Paulo Federal University) UNIFESP/EPM, Speech Therapist at NIAPEA.
3 Doctorate Student in Human Communication Disorders at UNIFESP/EPM, Speech Therapist at NIAPEA.
4 M.Sc. in Human Communication Disorders at UNIFES/EPM, Speech Therapist at the Integrated Center for Attention, Research and Learning in Hearing at UNIFESP/EPM, at the Hearing Disabled Center (CDA) at São Paulo Hospital and the Teuto Brasileiro Hearing Center.
5 Professor at UNIFESP/EPM, Associate Professor at the Speech Therapy Department at UNIFESP/EPM.
[6][6] PhD in Human Communication Disorders at UNIFESP/EPM, Associate Professor at the Speech Therapy Department at UNIFESP/EPM.
São Paulo Federal University (UNIFESP) - Integrated Center for Attention, Research and Learning in Hearing at UNIFESP/EPM (NIAPEA).
Send correspondence to: Eliara Pinto Vieira - Rua Borges Lagoa 512 apto. 92 B 04038-000 Vl. Clementino São Paulo SP.
Phone: (0xx11) 5084-4548 - E-mail eliarapv@yahoo.com.br
Paper submitted to the ABORL-CCF SGP (Management Publications System) on November 8th, 2006 and accepted for publication on May 03rd, 2007. cod. 3335.

Print: