ISSN 1808-8686 (on-line)
23/11/2024
Listing of the files selected for print:
Print:
3374 - Vol. 72 / Ed 3 / in 2006
Section: Artigo Original Pages: 382 to 387
Lymph node reactivity and microvessel density in neck metastases of unknown primary squamous cell carcinoma
Authors:
Ali Amar1, Allan Fernando Giovanini2, Marilene Paladino Rosas3, Onivaldo Cervantes4

Keywords: squamous cell cancer, lymph nodes, head and neck neoplasms, unknown primary neoplasms, pathologic neovascularization.

Abstract: Background: neoangiogenesis and the immune response are important mechanisms in metastasis development. Aim: to evaluate lymph node reactivity and microvessel density in neck metastasis of occult primary squamous cell carcinoma considering their histological and clinical variables. Study design: retrospesctive case-series. Method: 19 patients with neck metastasis of occult primary squamous cell carcinoma who underwent neck dissection between 1983 and 2000 were selected. The lymph nodes were reevaluated on the type of reactivity in both the cortical and paracortical areas, and the metastasis were assessed as to grade, desmoplasia, necrosis and microvessel density (CD34). The relationship between histological and clinical variables was evaluated. Results: the median microvessel density was 91 vessels/mm2, varying from 28 to 145. Paracortical hyperplasia was more common in patients below 55 years of age (90% x 44%, p= 0.05), but there was no relationship between reactivity patterns and microvessel density with prognosis. The disease-free survival was 52% in 3 years, being similar in both groups, with higher or lower microvessel densities. Conclusion: microvessel density in neck metastasis of occult primary squamous cell carcinoma had a great individual variability. It wasn't possible to establish the relationship between microvessel density and the clinical or histological variables studied.

INTRODUCTION

Neoangiogenesis is an important process for the development of tumors and is related with metastasization and the prognosis in different types of malignant neoplasms1-4. The immune response, as well as anti-tumor action, is part of the modulation of angiogenesis and other related mechanisms to the invasion and growth of the neoplasms. Regional lymph nodes frequently present signs of reactivity, the meaning of which is still unknown5,6. This study aims to evaluate microvascular density and linfonodal reactivity in cervical metastases of occult primary tumors, relating these findings to other histological and clinical variables, considering that this disease is an adequate clinical model for the study of metastases.

METHODS

All patients that had tissue samples available for analysis and follow-up of at least 12 months following initial treatment were included totalling 19 cases. Of these 16 patients were male and 3 were female. The average age was 55 years. Smoking and alcohol abuse were present in 16 and 13 cases respectively. Patients were staged according to the TNM 2002 classification (UICC-AJCC); 1 patient was stage N1, 8 patients were stage N2, and 10 patients were stage N3. The average number of nodes removed during radical neck dissection was 22.4 lymph nodes, varying from 4 to 49. Reactivity was evaluated in 427 lymph nodes and microvascular density was assessed in 60 lymph nodes with metastases. Conventional histological analysis evaluated the degree of differentiation, the presence of tumor necrosis, desmoplasia and lymph node reactivity. Lymph node assessment used Berlinger et al.`s and Klimek et al.`s criteria, as follows5,7:

A - Paracortical hyperplasia: increased paracortical celularity.

B - Follicular hyperplasia: increased number and size of lymphoid follicles in the lymph node cortical zone, formation of secondary follicles with prominent germinative centers.

C - Sinus hyperplasia: endothelial cell hyperplasia with medullary sinusoidal distension and histiocitosis.

D - Non-stimulated lymph node: lymph nodes with no lymphocyte proliferation.

E - Depleted lymph node: decreased lymphocyte population and diffuse fibrose in lymph nodes.

Reactivity was classified according to Amar et al., evaluating cortical and paracortical lymph node zones, taking into account the pattern in more than 2/3 of reactive lymph nodes. With no predominance, hyperplasia was considered as mixed. Lack of reactivity in more than 80% of lymph nodes defined the non-reactive pattern. Sinusal hyperplasia and histiocitosis were assessed separately. Histiocitosis was defined as the presence of macrophages in sinusoids, characterized by large nuclei, evident nucleoli and eosinophilic cytoplasm. Conventional histological analysis included the degree of differentiation, the presence of tumor necrosis and desmoplasia. Immunohistochemical reactions were made in the following order:

1. Primary antibody (Monoclonal Mouse Anti-Human CD34 Class II, Dako, M7165, Denmark) diluted at 1:100 in PBS, for 18 hours at 4°C in a humid chamber.

2 Secondary antibody (Biotinylated Goat Anti-Mouse/Rabbit Ig, of the StreptAB Complex/HRP Duet Mouse/Rabbit, Dako, K492, Denmark) diluted at 1:200, for 30 minutes at 37°C.

3 Reagent complex A (Streptavidin) and reagent B (Biotinylated Peroxydase) diluted at 1:200, for 30 minutes at 37°C.

4 Solution of 3,3'-Diaminobenzidine Tetrahydrochloride 60 mg% (Sigma, D5637, USA), 1 mL of Dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO), 1mL of 100 H2O2 at 6% and mL of PBS, for 5 minutes at 37°C, in the dark.

Microvessel counting was done under optic microscopy in 5 areas of greater intra-tumor vascular density (hot spots). A 0,4 mm2 area in each hot spot was selected using the image analysis program Image Tool 2.0 (University of Texas Health Science Center, USA); the number of microvessels were counted at 100x magnification and the values obtained in the 5 areas (2 mm2) were added. The relation between lymph node reactivity and metastatic microvascular density, the degree of differentiation, desmoplasia, necrosis, clinical findings and progression of patients were assessed.

The Kaplan-Meier actuarial survival method was used for statistical analysis of and the differences between the groups were assessed using Gehan`s test. For quantitative variables, Mann-Whitney`s U test and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used to assess differences between the groups. Correlation between quantitative variable was done with Spearman`s test. For qualitative variables, Fisher`s exact test and the difference between two variables test were used, taking into account bicaudal values for p. Calculation was done with the software Statistica 5.1 (Statsoft Incorporation, USA) and differences in all tests were considered significant when p-values were equal or below 0.05.

RESULTS

Reactivity was assessed in 427 lymph nodes, of which 102 presented paracortical hyperplasia and 122, follicular hyperplasia. Sinusal hyperplasia was observed in 93 lymph nodes from 15 patients, which also presented sinusal histiocitosis. Paracortical hyperplasia, including its presence mixed pattern cases, was seen in 90% of patients below age 55 and in 44% of patients aged 55 and above (p=0.05).

Average microvascular density was 91.5 microvessels/mm2, varying from 28 to 145. Considering independently the degree of differentiation in each lymph node and the respective microvascular density, well differentiated or moderately differentiated tumors had a mean 55 microvessels/mm2 (Q25-75% = 38-90), whereas undifferentiated tumors had a mean 53 microvessels/mm2 (Q25-75% = 43-116), p=0.85.

On follow-up, primary tumors was diagnosed in 3 patients, neck recurrences were diagnosed in 10 patients and 4 cases had metastases at a distance. In total, 5 patients received salvage treatment, of which 4 underwent surgery and 1 was treated with radiotherapy. The remaining patients received palliative treatment. Of patients undergoing salvage treatment, 3 patients had the disease controlled in the second treatment.

The mean microvascular density in cases that had metastases at a distance was 73 microvessels/mm2 (Q25-75% = 55-108) and the mean microvascular density in cases that did not have metastases at a distance was 99 microvessels/mm2 (Q25-75% = 28-145), p=0.59.

The disease-free survival for the whole group was 52% in 2 years and 44% in 5 years. Asymptomatic patients had an average 61 months follow-up time.

No significant relation was observed between the age of patients and microvascular density of metastases.


Figure 1. Microvascular density in metastases in relation to the pattern of lymph node reactivity.
legend: DMV = microvascular density. Max = maximum. Min = minimum. 75% = 75% quartile. 25% = 25% quartile. Kruskal-Wallis test, p=0.27.


Figure 2. Disease-free survival according to microvascular density in metastases.
legend: Actuarial survival Kaplan-Meier method. Gehan`s test, p=0.64


Figure 3. Disease-free survival according to the pattern of lymph node reactivity.
legend: Actuarial survival, Kaplan-Meier method. Gehan`s test, p = 0.35.


Figure 4. Correlation between the age of patients and microvascular density of metastases.
legend: DMV = microvascular density. Spearman`s test, r2 = 0.04, p = 0.86.



DISCUSSION

The first issue in cases of cervical metastases from occult primary tumors pertains to the origin of the tumor. Patients with occult primary tumors have similar epidemiological characteristics compared to patients with upper digestive tract and upper airway primary tumors. Furthermore, similar genetic alterations were found in so called normal oral cavities and in lymph node metastases in some cases of occult primary tumors that, when analyzed within the context of field cancerization and clonal expansion, are strong evidence supporting the hypothesis of their origin in the upper digestive tract and the upper airway epithelium, with possible regression or tumor dormancy in the primary site8-10. Many studies report the association between microvascular density in primary tumors and metastases3,4.

As neoangiogenesis is an important feature for the growth of metastases, increased angiogenesis suggests an advantage acquired due to clonal selection. An inverse relation was reported between microvascular density in the primary tumor and its respective metastases, suggesting that increased angiogenesis in a specific site might inhibite angiogenesis at a distance11,12. The hypothesis that metastases from occult primary tumors could inhibit the growth of the primary tumor could be supported by increased microvascular density, however we found great variability in our study. This variability does not eliminate the hypothesis that systemic control of neoangiogenesis is implied in the etiogeny of the occult primary tumor, although this may not be the only mechanism involved.

A further important issue is the meaning of tumor microvascular density, particularly when using the hot spot count technique3,13. The tumor may grow along existing microvessels or remodel the stroma, promoting neoangiogenesis; however, increased microvascular density does not mean that the tumor has an increased blood supply. Necrotic tumors may have increased neoangiogenesis, possibly caused by an increased inflammatory response in this type of cell death14. In order to have diffusion of oxygen and nutrients, cells may be up to 110 mm from blood microvessels, a measure that is reached with low microvascular density13. Lymph nodes have a high microvascular density, surpassing density observed in metastases; thus the change in blood flow caused by the growth of metastases also reinforces the idea that tumors modify the vascular structure and the dynamics of flow15,16. Unfortunately, the technique we used does not allow us to separate neoformed from existing microvessels.

There was no correlation between age and microvascular density, however, paracortical reactivity was found in greater frequency among patients aged below 55 years. As decreased angiogenesis is expected with aging, this finding suggests that neoangiogenesis in metastases is related to increased inhibition17.

Lymph node reactivity, seen as paracortical or follicular hyperplasia, was related to the best prognosis in different studies5,6,18. In various studies there was no consensus on which type of reactivity has the best prognosis, or a method to classify heterogeneous reactivity. It is not uncommon to find more than one pattern in the same lymph node or different patterns in many lymph nodes in the same patient, which makes it difficult to classify these patients, and which might explain the variety of results. Most patients with occult primary tumors had reactive lymph nodes. The immune response is related to the release of angiogenesis promoting substances. In this study, cases that had paracortical reactivity had the highest microvascular densities, although not statistically significant. In head and neck tumors lymph nodes with follicular or paracortical hyperplasia are located close to the tumor, that is, those that habitually have metastases. Therefore, it is possible that the immune response favors the implantation and the growth of lymph node metastases.7 Furthermore, the immune response could be responsible for primary tumor regression.

Histiocitose and sinusal hyperplasia were found in most patients. The latter is considered as non-specific reactivity and is associate with immunological dysfunction7. Being present in most patients, it was impossible to establish its relation with the other variables in the study. Sinusal hyperplasia is more frequent in lymph nodes distant from tumor, so we canot discard the possibility that the tumor or the immune response in the first lymph nodes down the lymph channel may cause an immune supressor effect upstream of the lymphatic flow7. This hypothesis is reinforced by the fact that lymphocytes from lymph nodes in the tumor drainage area have a lower cytotoxic action compared to lymphocytes in peripheral blood19. Macrophages (histiocytes) have an important function in remodelling the extracellular matrix and in modulating angiogenesis and the immune response. Macrophages can also modify the genic expression and the behavior of tumor cells, increasing their invasive potential. This action could both favor or inhibit tumor growth20,21.

Disease-free survival was similar between patients with increased or decreased microvascular density. Studies reporting the highest microvascular density with the less favorable prognosis had evaluated primary tumors4. As increased microvascular density is associated with metastases, this might explain the unfavorable progression in these cases. Decreased radiosensitivity has been reported in primary tumors that had extreme microvascular density, which might reflect regional modulation of neoangiogenesis22,23. In our study, multimodal treatment may have masked this correlation. Considering the great variation of microvascular density, also found in other studies, the sample was insufficient to establish significant relations with other clinical or histological variables24,25.

In conclusion, lymph node reactivity and microvascular density in metastases from occult primary tumors are not correlated and have no relation to disease progression. In these patients, where the effect of the primary tumor on study parameters may be disregarded, it appears that lymph node metastases, one of the most relevant prognostic factors in upper digestive tract and upper airway carcinomas, reflects clonal selection in which neoangiogenesis has minor importance. Furthermore, the classification we used may have masked correlations existing only in the metastatic microenvironment. Microvascular density reflects a form of interaction with adjacent tissues, essential for tumor growth, that may have regional or systemic effects. Obviously, the prognosis of an individual is multifactorial and microvascular density evaluates only a single moment within a fraction of the tumor. We were unable to clarify these functional aspects by the morphologic alterations we analyzed.

REFERENCES

1. Ellis LM, Fidler IJ. Angiogenesis and Metastasis. Eur J Cancer 1996;32A(14):2451-60.

2. Fidler IJ. Critical factors in the biology of human cancer metastasis: twenty-eight GHA Clowes Memorial Award Lecture. Cancer Res 1990;50(19):6130-8.

3. Vermeulen PB, Gasparini G, Fox SB, Toi M, Martin L, McCulloch P et al. Quantification of angiogenesis in solid human tumours: an international consensus on the methodology and criteria of evaluation. Eur J Cancer 1996;32A(14):2274-84.

4. Homer JJ, Greenman J, Stafford ND. Angiogenesis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Otolaryngol 2001;25(3):169-80.

5. Berlinger NT, Tsakraklides V, Pollack K, Adams GL, Yang M, Good RA. Immunologic assessment of regional lymph node histology in relation to survival in head and neck carcinoma. Cancer 1976;37(2):697-705.

6. Amar A, Rosa MP, Rapoport A, Magalhães MR, Carvalho MB. Reatividade linfonodal com metástase cervical de tumor primário oculto - Estudo de 24 pacientes. Rev Col Bras Cir 2001;28(3):193-197.

7. Klimek T, Glanz H, Dreyer T. Histomorphological charactheristics of non-metastatic lymph nodes in patients with head and neck cancer according to their site in the neck. Acta Otolaryngol 1996;116(2):336-40.

8. Califano J, Westra WH, Koch W, Meininger G, Reed A, Yip L et al. Unknown primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: molecular identification of the site of origin. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91(7):599-604.

9. Bedi GC, Westra WH, Gabrielson E, Koch W, Sidransky D. Multiple head and neck tumors: evidence for clonal origin. Cancer Res 1996;56(11):2484-7.

10. Slaughter DP, Southwick HW, Smejkal W. Field cancerization in oral stratified squamous epithelium. Cancer 1953;6:963-8.

11. Camphousen K, Moses MA, Beecken WD, Khan MK, Folkman J, O'Reilly MS. Radiation therapy to a primary tumor accelerates metastatic growth in mice. Cancer Res 2001;61(5):2207-11.

12. Amar A, Giovanini AF, Rosa MP, Yamassaki HO, Rapoport A. Densidade microvascular no carcinoma de língua. Rev Assoc Med Bras 2002;48(3):204-8.

13. Hlatky L, Hahnfeldt P, Folkman J. Clinical application of antiangiogenic therapy: microvessel density, what it does and doesn't tell us. J Natl Cancer Instit 2002;94(12):883-93.

14. Leek RD, Landers RJ, Harris AL, Lewis CE. Necrosis correlates with high vascular density and focal macrophage infiltration in invasive carcinoma of the breast. British J Cancer 1999;79(5/6):991-5.

15. Naresh KN, Nerurkar AY, Borges AM. Angiogenesis is redundant for tumor growth in lymph node metastases. Histopathology 2001;38(5):466-70.

16. Chikui T, Yuasa K, Maemura S, Kanda S. Change of angiostructure and hemodynamics in lymph node metastases in rabbits. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002;93(3):350-7.

17. Kreisle RA, Stebler BA, Ershler WB. Effect of host age on tumor-associated angiogenesis in mice. J Natl Cancer Inst 1990;82(1):44-7.

18. Cernea C, Montenegro F, Castro I, Cordeiro A, Gayotto L, Ferraz A et al. Prognostic significance of lymph node reactivity in the control of pathologic negative node squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Am J Surg 1997;174(5):548-51.

19. Nakamura H, Ishiguro K, Mori T. Different immune functions of peripheral blood, regional lymph node, and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in lung cancer patients. Cancer 1988;62(12):2489-97.

20. Al-Sarireh B, Eremin O. Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMS): disordered function, immune suppression and progressive tumor growth. JR Coll Surg Edimb 2000;45(1):1-16.

21. Chen JJ, Lin YC, Yao PL, Yuan A, Chen HY, Shun CT et al. Tumor-associated macrophages: the double-edged sword in cancer progression. J Clin Oncol 2005;23(5):953-64.

22. Koukorakis MI, Giatromanolaki A, Sivridis E, Fezoulidis I. Cancer vascularization: implications in radiotherapy? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000;48(2):545-53.

23. Ito Y, Kamijo T, Yokose T, Kawashima M, Ogino T, Ikeda H et al. Microvessel density predicts the radiosensitivity of metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in cervical lymph nodes. Int J Oncol 2001;19(6):1127-32.

24. Karavasilis V, Melamou-Mitsi V, Briasoulis E, Tsanou E, Kitsou E, Kalofonos H et al. Angiogênesis in cancer of unknown primary: clinicopathological study of CD34, VEGF and TSP-1. BMC Cancer 2005;5(1):25.

25. Hillen HF, Hak LE, Joosten-Achjanie SR, Arends JW. Microvessel density in unknown primary tumors. Int J Cancer 1997;74(1):81-5.

1 PhD, Assistant physician - Heliópolis Hospital.
2 PhD, Positivo University Center.
3 MS. Pathologist - Heliópolis Hospital.
4 Associate Professor - Head of the Head and Neck Department - Paulista School of Medicine.
Head and Neck Surgery Department - UNIFESP-EPM Head and Neck Surgery Department - Heliópolis Hospital.
Mailing address: Rua Pintassilgo 516 ap. 188 Vila Uberabinha 04514-032 São Paulo SP.
Paper submitted to the ABORL-CCF SGP (Management Publications System) on January 6th, 2006 and accepted for publication on March 28th, 2006.
Indexations: MEDLINE, Exerpta Medica, Lilacs (Index Medicus Latinoamericano), SciELO (Scientific Electronic Library Online)
CAPES: Qualis Nacional A, Qualis Internacional C


Print:
All Rights reserved © Revista Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia